Engineering

Undergraduate Engineering and Education Students Reflect on Their Interdisciplinary Teamwork Experiences Following Transition to Virtual Instruction Caused by COVID-19

This study explores undergraduate engineering and education students’ perspectives on their interdisciplinary teams throughout the rapid transition to online learning and instruction from a face-to-face to a virtual format. In this qualitative study, students’ reflections and focus groups from three interdisciplinary collaborations were analyzed using the lens of Social Cognitive Theory.

Author/Presenter

Jennifer J. Kidd

Min Jung Lee

Pilar Pazos

Krishnanand Kaipa

Stacie I. Ringleb

Orlando Ayala

Lead Organization(s)
Year
2022
Short Description

This study explores undergraduate engineering and education students’ perspectives on their interdisciplinary teams throughout the rapid transition to online learning and instruction from a face-to-face to a virtual format.

COVID-19 as a Magnifying Glass: Exploring the Importance of Relationships as Education Students Learn and Teach Robotics via Zoom

Ed+gineering, an NSF-funded program, adapted hands-on robotics instruction for online delivery in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. This qualitative multiple case study shares the experiences of participating education students in spring 2021 as they collaborated virtually with engineering students and fifth graders to engineer bioinspired robots in an afterschool technology club adapted to be virtual.

Author/Presenter

Jennifer Kidd

Krishnanand Kaipa

Kristie Gutierrez

Min Jung Lee

Pilar Pazos

Stacie I. Ringleb

Lead Organization(s)
Year
2022
Short Description

Ed+gineering, an NSF-funded program, adapted hands-on robotics instruction for online delivery in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. This qualitative multiple case study shares the experiences of participating education students in spring 2021 as they collaborated virtually with engineering students and fifth graders to engineer bioinspired robots in an afterschool technology club adapted to be virtual.

“Should We Build This?”: Student Reasoning in Intentionally Facilitated Socio-technical Design Talks

In pre-college engineering education contexts, detailed explorations of student discourse and teacher moves have begun to emerge. For example, recent studies have shown how particular teacher questions prompt student reasoning during particular phases of the engineering design process (Capobianco, deLisi, & Radloff, 2018) and how a teacher’s valuing of heterogeneous ideas sets the stage for students to take epistemic agency in engineering (Carlone, Mercier, & Metzger, 2021).

Author/Presenter

Kristen B. Wendell

Jessica Watkins

Natalie Annabelle De Lucca

Tyrine Jamella Pangan

Rae Woodcock

Chelsea Andrews

Year
2022
Short Description

We are developing case studies of specific types of teacher-supported conversation in which students are asked to consider design decision-making not just as a technical task, but as a complex socio-technical activity with ethical, economic, and political dimensions. Our work foregrounds a perspective of care in students’ engineering discourse and builds on emerging frameworks exploring compassionate design, macroethics and ideology, and critical socio-technical literacy. In this paper and its related poster, we summarize our first year of design talk enactments and analysis.

“Should We Build This?”: Student Reasoning in Intentionally Facilitated Socio-technical Design Talks

In pre-college engineering education contexts, detailed explorations of student discourse and teacher moves have begun to emerge. For example, recent studies have shown how particular teacher questions prompt student reasoning during particular phases of the engineering design process (Capobianco, deLisi, & Radloff, 2018) and how a teacher’s valuing of heterogeneous ideas sets the stage for students to take epistemic agency in engineering (Carlone, Mercier, & Metzger, 2021).

Author/Presenter

Kristen B. Wendell

Jessica Watkins

Natalie Annabelle De Lucca

Tyrine Jamella Pangan

Rae Woodcock

Chelsea Andrews

Year
2022
Short Description

We are developing case studies of specific types of teacher-supported conversation in which students are asked to consider design decision-making not just as a technical task, but as a complex socio-technical activity with ethical, economic, and political dimensions. Our work foregrounds a perspective of care in students’ engineering discourse and builds on emerging frameworks exploring compassionate design, macroethics and ideology, and critical socio-technical literacy. In this paper and its related poster, we summarize our first year of design talk enactments and analysis.

How Do Interdisciplinary Teams Co-construct Instructional Materials Emphasising Both Science and Engineering Practices?

To build a sustainable future, science and engineering education programmes should emphasise scientific investigation, collaboration across traditional science topics and disciplines, and engineering design, including design and evaluation of solutions.

Author/Presenter

Nancy Butler Songer

Year
2022
Short Description

To build a sustainable future, science and engineering education programmes should emphasise scientific investigation, collaboration across traditional science topics and disciplines, and engineering design, including design and evaluation of solutions. We adopted a qualitative case study design to address the research question, What is the process of team co-construction of instructional materials that emphasize learning through both science investigation and engineering design? The paper outlines the first year of our team co-construction activities involving the design, implementation, and evaluation of instructional materials for secondary science.