Algebra

What Do We Do with the Kids Who “Aren’t Ready” for Algebra?

in
Day: 
Thu

Presenters from two projects developing and researching ninth-grade “double-period” algebra approaches and materials present their distinct but compatible perspectives. Group discussion is encouraged.

Date/Time: 
1:45 pm - 3:45 pm
Session Type: 
PI-organized Discussion

Having students enter high school “unready” for algebra is not a new or rare problem. The challenges, frankly, are vast. Students identified as “unready” are extremely varied, as are the reasons they are included in specialized classes. Some, for example, are mathematically competent, but included “for English language support.” More, of course, have some difficulty specific to mathematics. Of those, many are weak in arithmetic.

Because both students and teachers often see little hope for success, any intervention must cause change in teachers as well as in students. Designing an approach that meets all these needs is, of course, a challenge. The presenters are working on projects challenged by this very issue.

Both the Transition to Algebra (TTA) and Intensified Algebra (IA) projects aim to help students get back on a success-in-mathematics track. The goal of both programs is to help underprepared students catch up to their peers, equipping them to be successful in algebra and future learning and work that requires mathematical proficiency. TTA focuses on specifically algebraic habits of mind in the CCSS Mathematical Practices, on the puzzling-it-out stance implicit in Mathematical Practice 1, and on getting students (and teachers) to notice their own competence.

IA complements a robust Algebra I curriculum with embedded, efficient “review and repair” strategies. The program aims to address the social, affective, linguistic, and strategic cognitive and metacognitive dimensions of learning mathematics. IA uses an asset-based approach that builds on students’ strengths, and helps students to develop academic skills and identities by engaging them in the learning experience.

The session is structured to involve attendees in interactive discussion of the issues that confront teachers and schools as they attempt to address the needs of struggling algebra students.

First Name: 
Jason Silverman
Professional Title: 
Assistant Professor
Organization/Institution: 
First Name: 
Barbara Dougherty
Professional Title: 
Richard G. Miller Endowed Chair of Mathematics Education
Organization/Institution: 
Algebra
First Name: 
Michael Evans
Professional Title: 
Associate Professor
Algebra
First Name: 
Barbara Brizuela
Professional Title: 
Associate Professor and Department Chair
Organization/Institution: 
About Me (Bio): 
Bárbara studied in Argentina and the US, where she moved in 1995. She has been a kindergarten and seventh grade teacher in Argentina as well as a Spencer Foundation research training grantee. In 2008-2009 Bárbara was a Spencer Fellow, a Fulbright Senior Scholar, and a Schuster Family Faculty Fellow in Arts & Sciences (Tufts University). Her current research focuses on children's learning of written numbers, notational aspects of mathematics (see http://ase.tufts.edu/education/projects/researchMathNotation.asp), and children's learning of elementary mathematics, including early algebra. Since 1998, she has also been involved in a research project on children's early algebraic reasoning and teaching elementary school children, exploring the intertwined nature of arithmetic and algebra (see www.earlyalgebra.org). In the past, she has also investigated the connections between engineering and algebra through a project funded by the General Electric Foundation. Her main areas of interest are early childhood education, cognitive development, and mathematics education.
Algebra
First Name: 
Patricia Almond
Professional Title: 
Research Associate
About Me (Bio): 
Patricia Almond is a nationally recognized expert in the areas of assessment and students with disabilities particularly related to assessment accommodations, alternate assessments for students with low incidence disabilities, and statewide assessment systems: (a) CO-EAG (2003- 05) Investigating the efficacy of two different formats for alternate assessment: performance tasks and portfolios across seven states with CO as the lead state; (b) DAATA (2004-06)— producing a handbook for states explaining how to document technical adequacy for alternate assessments; (c) SALLSA (2007-09)—conducting alignment studies in PA, GA, WA, and WY; (d) OK-GSEG (2007-10)—examining the validity of an alternate reading assessment in OK; (d) UT-EAG (2008-10)—developing alternate assessment mathematics content with UT, ID, and FL; and (e) Until 2004, Dr. Almond was the director for alternate assessment and accommodations for Oregon’s statewide assessment system and was the primary architect for Oregon’s alternate assessments. She facilitated the Oregon Accommodations Panel, which interpreted research and evaluated the validity of accommodations to Oregon assessments in reading, writing, mathematics, and science. She worked on several recent federally funded projects related to including students with disabilities in statewide accountability systems. Since 2000 she has consulted directly with the states of CO, AK, PA, GA, WA, WY, OK, UT, ID, and FL on the design, implementation, and validity of their alternate assessments. pjalmond@uoregon.edu
Algebra

What is Algebra? Cross-Curricular Textbook Analyses

Presenter(s): 
Mary Ann Huntley
Maria Terrell
Contact Info: 
Year: 
2010
Month: 
December
Syndicate content